robert.kern at gmail.com
Sun Sep 20 02:22:53 CEST 2009
exarkun at twistedmatrix.com wrote:
> On 19 Sep, 11:04 pm, robert.kern at gmail.com wrote:
>> Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
>>>>> the pyjamas project is taking a slightly different approach to achieve
>>>>> this same goal: beat the stuffing out of the pyjamas compiler, rather
>>>>> double-run regression tests (once as python, second time converted to
>>>>> anyway, just thought there might be people who would be intrigued (or
>>>>> horrified enough to care what's being done in the name of computer
>>>>> science) by either of these projects.
>>>> I've added pyjamas to the implementations page on the Python Wiki in
>>>> the compilers section:
>>> In what way is pyjamas a python implementation? As far as I know
>>> pyjamas is an application written in python that is capable of
>>> implementation'? That would be news to me but I've been wrong many
>>> times before.
> the same behavior. I think you're implying that it does, but you left
> it implicit, and I think the point is central to deciding if pyjamas is
> a Python implementation or not, so I thought I'd try to make it explicit.
> the same behavior?
Barring the unimplemented libraries and bugs, yes. If you read the original post
in this thread, you will see that on the roadmap is running the entire Python
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the Python-list