Recommend Commercial graphing library

Grant Edwards invalid at invalid.invalid
Tue Apr 6 18:22:01 CEST 2010


On 2010-04-06, Grant Edwards <invalid at invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 2010-04-06, Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel at sequans.com> wrote:
>> Pablo Recio Quijano wrote:
>>> Why must be commercial, when there is open and free alternatives? Like 
>>> GNU Plot.
>>
>> Gnuplot is ugly. I'm using it because I don't care if it's ugly but it 
>> clearly lacks of look & feel for presentations, as requested by the OP.
>   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>   
> In other words, Gnuplot presents information in a clear, obfuscated
                                                           
That should be:                                           unobsuscated

stupid spell-checker...
               
Seriously, most of the graphs I've seen in "presentations" would make
Ed Tufte spin in his grave.

If it's 2D data, you don't need to use a 3D graph.
          
-- 
Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! Is it 1974?  What's
                                  at               for SUPPER?  Can I spend
                              gmail.com            my COLLEGE FUND in one
                                                   wild afternoon??



More information about the Python-list mailing list