ANN: obfuscate 0.2.2
debatem1 at gmail.com
Sun Apr 11 05:00:50 CEST 2010
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Steven D'Aprano
<steve at remove-this-cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:34:17 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote:
>> Steven D'Aprano <steve at REMOVE-THIS-cybersource.com.au> writes:
>>> DISCLAIMER: obfuscate is not cryptographically strong, and should not
>>> be used where high security is required.
>> Certainly no one should never use obfuscate's rot13 function for high
>> security. Use at least double-rot13 instead, or maybe even quadruple
>> rot13 ;-).
> Ha ha, that's funny! I've never heard that one before! *wink*
I think I lost a sarcasm detector to this line- are you being serious?
More information about the Python-list