Python 2.X vs. 3.X - level of acceptance?
Roger Binns
rogerb at rogerbinns.com
Tue Apr 27 12:47:49 EDT 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 04/27/2010 03:57 AM, Stephan Schulz wrote:
> Is Python 3 sucessful enough to make a switch worthwhile now?
The language/interpreter is just fine. The biggest problem is 3rd party
modules. My own module (APSW) has been available since the early betas of
Python 3 and I make it available for Python 2.3 onwards.
I have a release every month or two, and so you can see adoption trends for
Windows users over time:
http://code.google.com/p/apsw/downloads/list?can=1&q=binary
Python 2.6 is by far the most popular, but 3.1 is picking up. It is
disturbing just many 2.3 users there still are though.
Roger
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkvXFTUACgkQmOOfHg372QR7YwCgpZdsgkV9iBy/1/8eIBwxy3S4
Sy8AoI8vsivExNADG9Bmx+WbWTQN74VD
=0lxT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Python-list
mailing list