easy question on parsing python: "is not None"
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Sat Aug 7 03:41:03 CEST 2010
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> when testing for None, you actually want None and not some look-alike
> that merely tests equal to None.
That's true, although I can't think of a use case for an object
that compares equal to None but isn't -- except for obfuscated
code competition entries and making obscure points in usenet
More information about the Python-list