79 chars or more?
roy at panix.com
Tue Aug 17 04:50:57 CEST 2010
In article <mailman.2213.1282012961.1673.python-list at python.org>,
James Mills <prologic at shortcircuit.net.au> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:35 PM, AK <andrei.avk at gmail.com> wrote:
> > As monitors are getting bigger, is there a general change in opinion on
> > the 79 chars limit in source files? I've experimented with 98 characters
> > per line and I find it quite a bit more comfortable to work with that
> > length, even though sometimes I have to edit files in 80 width
> > terminals, it's still easier to adapt to some inconvenience when that
> > happens than the other way around, since about 95% of time or more, I do
> > use wider editor window or terminal.
> > Is going over 79 still a terrible thing to do? Â -andrei
> My personal opinion (despite monitors being wider) is
> the horizontal scrolling isn't worth it. Stick to a 80-char width.
I disagree with James. I have no problem with going wider than 80, if
it improves readability by not forcing you to fold lines in unnatural
There's more important things to worry about.
More information about the Python-list