Why is there no platform independent way of clearing a terminal?
Tim Harig
usernet at ilthio.net
Sun Aug 1 06:27:46 EDT 2010
On 2010-08-01, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On 01/08/2010 06:17, Tim Harig wrote:
>> On 2010-08-01, Lawrence D'Oliveiro<ldo at geek-central.gen.new_zealand> wrote:
>>> In message<i2q3sk$3pf$1 at speranza.aioe.org>, Tim Harig wrote:
>>>
>>>> It would be rewarding as it would make writing cross-platform charactor
>>>> mode applications possible.
>>>
>>> I thought Windows users were allergic to command lines.
>>
>> To the best of my knowledge, there have never been any documentated
>> cases of computer software related alleries. There are however several
>> chemicals used in the process of constructing computer hardware componets
>> which have been linked to allergy illnesses. Maybe Windows users are
>> simply allergic to their computers.
>
> Windows users biggest allergy is to this strange world that involves
> "make" on other boxes, whatever that is, it strikes me as rather
> archaic. Personally I find double clicking on an msi file rather easier.
I work with several thousand computers located on three different
continents. Few of them have mice attached to them. If you think double
clicking is a better method, be my guest; but, you need to get a package
installed and configured on all of them before lunch.
Its also kind of funny that I couldn't get the msi to work with a large
percentage of the systems that I work with. Make works on all but one out
of the box, and potentially on the last with the addition of SFU or
Cygwin.
With all that said, I am still not sure what the make/msi question has
anything to do with packing a backup, cross platform, implementation of
curses that allows the curses module to give Python a cross platform method
of character mode manipulation.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list