Problem with tarfile module to open *.tar.gz files - unreliable ?
Dave Angel
davea at ieee.org
Fri Aug 20 10:10:13 EDT 2010
m_ahlenius wrote:
> On Aug 20, 6:57 am, m_ahlenius <ahleni... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 20, 5:34 am, Dave Angel <da... at ieee.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> m_ahlenius wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am relatively new to doing serious work in python. I am using it to
>>>> access a large number of log files. Some of the logs get corrupted
>>>> and I need to detect that when processing them. This code seems to
>>>> work for quite a few of the logs (all same structure) It also
>>>> correctly identifies some corrupt logs but then it identifies others
>>>> as being corrupt when they are not.
>>>>
>>>> example error msg from below code:
>>>>
>>>> Could not open the log file: '/disk/7-29-04-02-01.console.log.tar.gz'
>>>> Exception: CRC check\
>>>> failed 0x8967e931 !=x4e5f1036L
>>>>
>>>> When I manually examine the supposed corrupt log file and use
>>>> "tar -xzvof /disk/7-29-04-02-01.console.log.tar.gz " on it, it opens
>>>> just fine.
>>>>
>>>> Is there anything wrong with how I am using this module? (extra code
>>>> removed for clarity)
>>>>
>>>> if tarfile.is_tarfile( file ):
>>>> try:
>>>> xf =arfile.open( file, "r:gz" )
>>>> for locFile in xf:
>>>> logfile =f.extractfile( locFile )
>>>> validFileFlag =rue
>>>> # iterate through each log file, grab the first and
>>>> the last lines
>>>> lines =ter( logfile )
>>>> firstLine =ines.next()
>>>> for nextLine in lines:
>>>> ....
>>>> continue
>>>>
>>>> logfile.close()
>>>> ...
>>>> xf.close()
>>>> except Exception, e:
>>>> validFileFlag =alse
>>>> msg =\nCould not open the log file: " + repr(file) + "
>>>> Exception: " + str(e) + "\n"
>>>> else:
>>>> validFileFlag =alse
>>>> lTime =xtractFileNameTime( file )
>>>> msg =>>>>>>> Warning " + file + " is NOT a valid tar archive
>>>> \n"
>>>> print msg
>>>>
>>> I haven't used tarfile, but this feels like a problem with the Win/Unix
>>> line endings. I'm going to assume you're running on Windows, which
>>> could trigger the problem I'm going to describe.
>>>
>>> You use 'file' to hold something, but don't show us what. In fact, it's
>>> a lousy name, since it's already a Python builtin. But if it's holding
>>> fileobj, that you've separately opened, then you need to change that
>>> open to use mode 'rb'
>>>
>>> The problem, if I've guessed right, is that occasionally you'll
>>> accidentally encounter a 0d0a sequence in the middle of the (binary)
>>> compressed data. If you're on Windows, and use the default 'r' mode,
>>> it'll be changed into a 0a byte. Thus corrupting the checksum, and
>>> eventually the contents.
>>>
>>> DaveA
>>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks for the comments - I'll change the variable name.
>>
>> I am running this on linux so don't think its a Windows issue. So if
>> that's the case
>> is the 0d0a still an issue?
>>
>> 'mark
>>
>
> Oh and what's stored currently in
> The file var us just the unopened pathname to the
> Target file I want to open
>
>
>
No, on Linux, there should be no such problem. And I have to assume
that if you pass the filename as a string, the library would use 'rb'
anyway. It's just if you pass a fileobj, AND are on Windows.
Sorry I wasted your time, but nobody else had answered, and I hoped it
might help.
DaveA
More information about the Python-list
mailing list