Which non SQL Database ?

[Jorge Biquez]

Hello all.

Understood perfectly.

Will forget other alternatives. Sqlite3 is the 
best option. Thanks for the explanation and time.

Sqlite for single user and Postgresql will be the choice.

Thanks all.

Take care

Jorge Biquez

At 06:01 p.m. 04/12/2010, you wrote:
>Jorge Biquez <jbiquez at icsmx.com> writes:
>
> > I do not see a good reason for not using Sqlite3 BUT if for some
> > reason would not be an option.... what plain schema of files would you
> > use? I am sorry to insist.
>
>SQLite stores the entire database in a single file. Does that answer the
>question? I'm not sure I understand.
>
>Preferably, check SQLite's own site <URL:http://www.sqlite.org/> for
>answers, since it seems your concerns are not specific to Python. If you
>have Python-specific concerns about SQLite you'll need to make them more
>explicit for us to answer them.
>
> > I do not know much about the size tha using Sqlite adds to the
> > application
>
>As you noted, SQLite is already in the Python standard library.
>
> > For the web part, yes, of course would be multiple users.
>
>Systems like Berkeley DB, SQLite, dBase, et cetera achieve their
>simplicity at the expense of concurrent access to the database.
>
>If you want concurrent access to the database by many connections,
>that's where you need to look at a more sophisticated solution. For
>efficient concurrent access, a DBMS such as PostgreSQL is the best
>choice.
>
>--
>  \       “When I was little, my grandfather used to make me stand in a |
>   `\   closet for five minutes without moving. He said it was elevator |
>_o__)                                        practice.” —Steven Wright |
>Ben Finney
>--
>http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list