Can't deepcopy bytes-derived class

[Terry Reedy]

On 12/9/2010 9:19 AM, Dan wrote:

> I tested the 4 line change anyway...removing it from 3.2 had no
> detrimental effect, adding it to 3.1 had no effect.  It must be
> something else.

Then there must have been a change in the bytes object, which is deeper 
than I want to go. 3.2 has a LOT of little improvements. When it comes 
out, just about all 3.1 users should upgrade unless one has production 
code disabled by a bugfix.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy