How to guard against bugs like this one?
tjreedy at udel.edu
Tue Feb 2 19:29:54 CET 2010
On 2/2/2010 9:13 AM, kj wrote:
>> As for fixing it, unfortunately it's not quite so simple to fix without
>> breaking backwards-compatibility. The opportunity to do so for Python 3.0
>> was missed.
> This last point is to me the most befuddling of all. Does anyone
> know why this opportunity was missed for 3.0? Anyone out there
> with the inside scoop on this? Was the fixing of this problem
> discussed in some PEP or some mailing list thread? (I've tried
> Googling this but did not hit on the right keywords to bring up
> the deliberations I'm looking for.)
There was a proposal to put the whole stdlib into a gigantic package, so
would become, for instance
Guido rejected that. I believe he both did not like it and was concerned
about making upgrade to 3.x even harder. The discussion was probably on
the now closed py3k list.
Terry Jan Reedy
More information about the Python-list