Simple question about Queue.Queue and threads
frank at chagford.com
Sat Feb 6 07:30:55 CET 2010
On Feb 6, 7:59 am, "Gabriel Genellina" <gagsl-... at yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
> En Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:45:30 -0300, Frank Millman <fr... at chagford.com>
> > However, the queue is not empty - it still has the final None in it.
> Yes - but who cares? :)
That was my point. I didn't think I needed to care, but I wanted to be sure
I was not missing something.
I will just discard all the final cleanup code.
> (BTW, I'd use a different sentinel instead of None; perhaps this could not
> happen in your current code, but it's easy to inadvertedly put a None in
> the queue, stopping all workers prematurely.)
More information about the Python-list