equivalent of Ruby's Pathname?

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

Phlip a écrit :
> Gregory Ewing wrote:
> 
>> In any case, introducing any kind of path object at this
>> late stage of the language's development would result in
>> More Than One Way to represent pathnames, with neither of
>> them being the obvious choice.
> 
> Ah, now we get down to the root of the problem. Because Python is so
> stuck on the "one best way to do it"
> mentality, language bigotry
> prevented the Committee from picking from among several equally valid
> but non-best options.

You failed to actually _read_ what you're answering to. Try again. Using 
your brain, this time.