Python 3.0 usage?
philip at semanchuk.com
Thu Feb 18 14:37:59 CET 2010
On Feb 18, 2010, at 12:20 AM, alex23 wrote:
> MRAB <pyt... at mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:
>> Python 3.0 had a relatively short run before it was superseded by
>> 3.1 due to certain issues, so, IMHO, I wouldn't worry about it unless
>> someone especially requests/requires it.
> And even then, I'd just tell them I accept patches :)
Excellent idea. =)
Thanks to all who replied.
More information about the Python-list