What's the word on using """ to comment-out?
steven at REMOVE.THIS.cybersource.com.au
Thu Feb 25 01:51:20 CET 2010
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:18:27 +0000, kj wrote:
> I think I remember, early in my learning of Python, coming across the
> commandment "THOU SHALT NOT USE TRIPLE-QUOTES TO COMMENT-OUT LINES OF
> CODE", or something to that effect. But now I can't find it!
> Is my memory playing me a trick?
> After all, from what I've seen since then, the practice of
> triple-quote-commenting (or TQC, pardon the TCA) is in fact quite
Oooh, I hope not... for anything but Q&D scripting, folks should be using
source control rather than filling their source code up with vast lumps
of old dead code.
> Is TQC OK after all?
Only if you're lazy and slack, and being lazy and slack is itself only
okay if you are only lazy and slack *a very little bit*. In a small
script, using test-driven development, it is acceptable to comment out
dead code for a single test run. At the end of the run, you either
reverse the commenting out, or you delete the dead code.
> If not, what's the case against it?
Commenting out dead code is, itself, a BAD THING, regardless of whether
you use comments or triple-quotes.
Triple-quoted comments are worrying, though, because the result of them
is not specified by the language. (Other than docstrings, of course.) The
CPython compiler optimizes them away at compile time, so they have no
runtime influence at all, but other implementations may not include this
optimization and so the string gets compiled into the byte-code, created
at runtime, then immediately deleted. Ouch.
More information about the Python-list