taking python enterprise level?...

Diez B. Roggisch deets at nospam.web.de
Fri Feb 26 01:12:00 CET 2010


> That better way turned out to asynchronous update transactions.  All we
> did was keep feeding updates to the remote site and forget about ACKS.
> We then had a second process which handled ACKS and tracked which
> packets had been properly transferred.  The system had IDs on each
> update and retries happened if ACKS didn't happen soon enough.
> Naturally we ignored ACKS that we had already processed.

sounds like using UDP to me, of course with a protocol on top (namely 
the one you implemented).

Any reason you sticked to TCP instead?

Diez



More information about the Python-list mailing list