Dreaming of new generation IDE

[Arnaud Delobelle]

Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com> writes:

> I prefer Guido's formulation (which, naturally, I can't find a direct
> quote for right now): if you expect that a boolean argument is only
> going to take *literal* True or False, then it should be split into
> two functions.

So rather than three boolean arguments, would you have eight functions?

-- 
Arnaud