Bugs in CPython 3.1.1 [wave.py]
steve at holdenweb.com
Tue Jan 12 19:14:57 CET 2010
Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
> * Stefan Behnel:
>> Alf P. Steinbach, 12.01.2010 12:51:
>>> Well how f*****g darn patient do they expect me to be?
>>> I've decided: I'm not.
>>> Oh sh**, just as I typed the period above the mail finally arrived.
>>> It's been, let's see, about 20+ minutes!
>>> And still some miles to go.
>>> Somebody should say THANK YOU for all this effort, pointing out not
>>> just the bug but exactly what needs fixing, not whining about me not
>>> wasting half an hour on going through proper channels after already
>>> wasting much time on that bug!
>> Maybe you should just stop using the module. Writing the code yourself
>> is certainly going to be faster than reporting that bug, don't you think?
> It's part of the standard Python distribution.
> Don't you think bugs in the standard library should be fixed?
> Anyways, is there any alternative for wave output in Windows except
> writing the thing from scratch?
For what it's worth, reporting the bug is the right decision. Had you
gone to the trouble of a rewrite and proposed your new module for the
standard library the first discovery you would have made is that nothing
gets accepted without a commitment of maintenance.
Clearly that would have been too much to accept when you merely wish to
correct a small-ish bug in an already satisfactory module.
Thanks again, and I hope the change gets into 3.2, and also the next 3.1
maintenance release. The only remaining requirement is some developer
time, but that is our scarcest resource.
PS: Next time it would have helped to include a URL to the issue.
FYI there is already some feedback in the tracker.
Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119
PyCon is coming! Atlanta, Feb 2010 http://us.pycon.org/
Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/
UPCOMING EVENTS: http://holdenweb.eventbrite.com/
More information about the Python-list