Is python not good enough?
tanix at mongo.net
Wed Jan 13 10:06:13 CET 2010
In article <53ec94c0-dbdd-4901-a46b-d7faee121e1a at j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, "johan.sanden at gmail.com" <johan.sanden at gmail.com> wrote:
>On Jan 13, 12:55=A0am, a... at pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote:
>> In article <1b42700d-139a-4653-8669-d4ee2fc48... at r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.=
>> ikuta liu =A0<ikut... at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >Is python not good enough? for google, enhance python performance is
>> >the good way better then choose build Go language?
>> It is not at all clear that -- despite some comments to the contrary --
>> the Go developers are intending to compete with Python. =A0Go seems much
>> more intended to compete with C++/Java. =A0If they're successful, we may
>> eventually see GoPython. =A0;-)
>> Aahz (a... at pythoncraft.com) =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 <*> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http:/=
>> "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait
>> until you hire an amateur." =A0--Red Adair
>GoPython i think would be neat.
Well, as soon as they restore the braces to identify the code
blocks and provide the functionality of advanced statically
type languages, such as threads, async processing, all synchronization
primitives, garbage collection, events and GUI, i'd be willing
to switch to Python. Some of it is already there. But not all.
Except, before doing it, I'd like to know what Python buys me
compared to say Java.
Programmer's Goldmine collections:
Tens of thousands of code examples and expert discussions on
organized by major topics of language, tools, methods, techniques.
More information about the Python-list