Ad hoc lists vs ad hoc tuples
mal at egenix.com
Wed Jan 27 15:47:06 CET 2010
Iain King wrote:
> On Jan 27, 10:20 am, Floris Bruynooghe <floris.bruynoo... at gmail.com>
>> One thing I ofter wonder is which is better when you just need a
>> throwaway sequence: a list or a tuple? E.g.:
>> if foo in ['some', 'random', 'strings']:
>> if [bool1, bool2, boo3].count(True) != 1:
>> (The last one only works with tuples since python 2.6)
>> Is a list or tuple better or more efficient in these situations?
>> PS: This is inspired by some of the space-efficiency comments from the
>> list.pop(0) discussion.
> I tend to use tuples unless using a list makes it easier to read. For
> if foo in ('some', 'random', 'strings'):
> draw.text((10,30), "WHICH IS WHITE", font=font)
> draw.line([(70,25), (85,25), (105,45)])
> I've no idea what the performance difference is; I've always assumed
> it's negligible.
Tuples are a faster to create than lists, so if you create
lots of them and don't need the list features, use tuples.
Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Jan 27 2010)
>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/
::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! ::::
eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
More information about the Python-list