Writing a string.ishex function
MRAB
python at mrabarnett.plus.com
Fri Jan 15 13:14:28 EST 2010
Duncan Booth wrote:
> MRAB <python at mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:
>
>> Duncan Booth wrote:
>>> MRAB <python at mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I raise you one character:
>>>>
>>>> ishex2 = lambda s: not(set(s)-set(string.hexdigits)) # Yours
>>>> ishex3 = lambda s: not set(s)-set(string.hexdigits) # Mine
>>>>
>>>> I could actually go three better:
>>>>
>>>> ishex3=lambda s:not set(s)-set(string.hexdigits)
>>> But none of those pass your own "ishex('') should return False" test.
>> Neither do the others!
>
> That's true, but since you were the one that pointed out they were all
> broken I would have thought your solution should actually work.
>
> I'm sure you'll agree that a longer solution that works trumps any short
> but broken solution.
I believe that the rules of the character-counting game don't require
correctness, only that it's no worse.
A real solution would use 'def', have a docstring, etc, of course.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list