On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:16 AM, rantingrick <rantingrick at gmail.com> wrote: > So can anyone explain this poor excuse for a map function? Maybe GVR > should have taken it out in 3.0? *scratches head* Let me get this straight... You're complaining about some trivial code you've written and a 0.002 or less execution time ? I must be missing something! --James