Possible to make subprocess.Popen jobs run serially rather than in parallel?

[Jean-Michel Pichavant]

Chris Seberino wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2:03 pm, Stephen Hansen <me+list/pyt... at ixokai.io> wrote:
>
>   
>> Just call "process.wait()" after you call process = subprocess.Popen(...)
>>     
>
> I may have not been clear.....
> I *don't* want web app to block on Popen.wait.
> I *do* want the Popen process to run in the background which web app
> still runs doing other things.
>
> Rather, I don't want *MANY* Popen processes to run in the
> background....just one preferably.
>
> cs
>   
then put the process.wait() in a single thread, this thread will chain 
Popen calls in the background.

If your executing python code in your Popen close, you'd better go for 
the multiprocessing module (python 2.6+)

JM