Why Is Escaping Data Considered So Magical?
Lawrence D'Oliveiro
ldo at geek-central.gen.new_zealand
Fri Jun 25 20:47:48 EDT 2010
In message <mailman.2046.1277445301.32709.python-list at python.org>, Cameron
Simpson wrote:
> On 25Jun2010 15:38, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo at geek-central.gen.new_zealand>
> wrote:
>
> | In message <2010062422432660794-angrybaldguy at gmailcom>, Owen Jacobson
> | wrote:
>
> | > Why would I write this when SQLAlchemy, even without using its ORM
> | > features, can do it for me?
> |
> | SQLAlchemy doesn’t seem very flexible. Looking at the code examples
> | <http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/examples.html>, they’re very procedural:
> | build object, then do a string of separate method calls to add data to
> | it. I prefer the functional approach, as in my table-update example.
>
> He said "without using its ORM".
I noticed that. So were those examples I referenced above “using its ORM”?
Can you offer better examples “without using its ORM”?
More information about the Python-list
mailing list