Multiprocessing.Pipe is not concurrently bi-directional (design flaw?)

MRAB python at
Wed Mar 3 03:37:23 CET 2010

Metalone wrote:
> Well, I just realized that I could use a separate pipe to send the
> result back.  This might work ok.

Or you could call .poll on the pipe and sleep if there's no input yet.

More information about the Python-list mailing list