Working group for Python CPAN-equivalence?
john at castleamber.com
Thu Mar 4 19:06:15 CET 2010
Ben Finney <ben+python at benfinney.id.au> writes:
> Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> writes:
>> On 3/3/2010 12:05 PM, John Nagle wrote:
>> > CPAN is a repository. PyPi is an collection of links.
>> As Ben said, PyPI currently is also a respository and not just links
>> to other repositories.
>> > CPAN enforces standard organization on packages. PyPi does not.
> This is, I think, something we don't need as much in Python; there is a
> fundamental difference between Perl's deeply nested namespace hierarchy
> and Python's inherently flat hierarchy.
Perl's hierarchy is 2 (e.g. Text::Balanced) or 3 levels deep
(e.g. Text::Ngram::LanguageDetermine), rarely deeper
(Text::Editor::Vip::Buffer::Plugins::Display). Which is in general most
likely just one level deeper than Python. Perl is not Java.
And I think that one additional level (or more) is a /must/ when you
have 17,530 (at the time of writing) modules.
If Python wants it's own CPAN it might be a good first move to not have
modules named "xmlrpclib", "wave", "keyword", "zlib", etc. But I don't
see that happen soon :-).
John Bokma j3b
Hacking & Hiking in Mexico - http://johnbokma.com/
http://castleamber.com/ - Perl & Python Development
More information about the Python-list