A "scopeguard" for Python

[Steve Holden]

Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
> * Robert Kern:
[...]
>> No, it only argues that "with Cleanup():" is supernumerary.
> 
> I don't know what "supernumerary" means, but to the degree that the
> argument says anything about a construct that is not 'finally', it says
> the same about general "with".
> 
So rather than look up the meaning if a word you aren't familiar with
you will argue against its use in generic style?

> So whatever you mean by supernumerary, you're saying that the argument
> implies that "with" is supernumerary.
> 
> This is starting to look like some earlier discussions in this group,
> where even basic logic is denied.
> 
Why not just stick to the facts and forget about the earlier discussions?

regards
 Steve
-- 
Steve Holden           +1 571 484 6266   +1 800 494 3119
PyCon is coming! Atlanta, Feb 2010  http://us.pycon.org/
Holden Web LLC                 http://www.holdenweb.com/
UPCOMING EVENTS:        http://holdenweb.eventbrite.com/