Have you embraced Python 3.x yet?

David Cournapeau cournape at gmail.com
Mon Mar 29 14:58:17 CEST 2010

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Ben Finney <ben+python at benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> David Cournapeau <cournape at gmail.com> writes:
>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Chris Colbert <sccolbert at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I won't switch until NumPy and SciPy make the jump.
>> We're almost there, though (mostly thanks to other people's work on
>> Numpy):
>> http://github.com/cournape/scipy3/branches/py3k
> Are you maintaining separate parallel Python 3 versus Python 2 code
> bases?

No, we don't have the manpower to have two code bases - the C code
handles both versions, and the python 2 code is converted to python 3
"on the fly".

We are lucky not to have too much IO / string handling, which are the
hard things to handle with 2to3. The hard part was NumPy, because it
used the python C api so much. Porting scipy to something somewhat
usable was an half-day job,



More information about the Python-list mailing list