freebsd and multiprocessing

Tim Arnold a_jtim at bellsouth.net
Tue Mar 2 12:59:10 EST 2010


On Mar 2, 11:52 am, Philip Semanchuk <phi... at semanchuk.com> wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Tim Arnold wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm intending to use multiprocessing on a freebsd machine (6.3
> > release, quad core, 8cpus, amd64). I see in the doc that on this
> > platform I can't use synchronize:
>
> > ImportError: This platform lacks a functioning sem_open
> > implementation, therefore, the required synchronization primitives
> > needed will not function, see issue 3770.
>
> > As far as I can tell, I have no need to synchronize the processes--I
> > have several processes run separately and I need to know when they're
> > all finished; there's no communication between them and each owns its
> > own log file for output.
>
> > Is anyone using multiprocessing on FreeBSD and run into any other
> > gotchas?
>
> Hi Tim,
> I don't use multiprocessing but I've written two low-level IPC  
> packages, one for SysV IPC and the other for POSIX IPC.
>
> I think that multiprocessing prefers POSIX IPC (which is where  
> sem_open() comes from). I don't know what it uses if that's not  
> available, but SysV IPC seems a likely alternative. I must emphasize,  
> however, that that's a guess on my part.
>
> FreeBSD didn't have POSIX IPC support until 7.0, and that was sort of  
> broken until 7.2. As it happens, I was testing my POSIX IPC code  
> against 7.2 last night and it works just fine.
>
> SysV IPC works under FreeBSD 6 (and perhaps earlier versions; 6 is the  
> oldest I've tested). ISTR that by default each message queue is  
> limited to 2048 bytes in total size. 'sysctl kern.ipc' can probably  
> tell you that and may even let you change it. Other than that I can't  
> think of any SysV limitations that might bite you.
>
> HTH
> Philip

Hi Philip,
Thanks for that information. I wish I could upgrade the machine to
7.2! alas, out of my power.  I get the following results from sysctl:
% sysctl kern.ipc | grep msg
kern.ipc.msgseg: 2048
kern.ipc.msgssz: 8
kern.ipc.msgtql: 40
kern.ipc.msgmnb: 2048
kern.ipc.msgmni: 40
kern.ipc.msgmax: 16384

I'll write some test programs using multiprocessing and see how they
go before committing to rewrite my current code. I've also been
looking at 'parallel python' although it may have the same issues.
http://www.parallelpython.com/

thanks again,
--Tim



More information about the Python-list mailing list