Picking a license

[mk]

Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Are you implying that by distributing your libraries under the MIT or 
> Apache licence, no linking is required? That's a cool trick, can you 
> explain how it works please?

Err.. Linking statically with library in question? Which excludes LGPL 
for legal reasons and doesn't exclude MIT/Apache license for legal reasons?

(this is obviously orthogonal to a technical question why static linking 
should be used sparringly if at all)


Regards,
mk