Object-oriented (was: Is Python a functional programming language?)

[Teemu Likonen]

* 2010-05-15 09:42 (-0700), travis wrote:

> PS: Why do people call LISP object-oriented?  Are they smoking crack?
>     No classes, no methods, no member variables... WTF?

Maybe because Common Lisp has a strong support for object-oriented
programming.


Peter Seibel: Practical Common Lisp

    Generic functions and methods (chapter 16)
    http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/object-reorientation-generic-functions.html

    Classes (chapter 17)
    http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/object-reorientation-classes.html

Paul Graham: On Lisp

    Object-Oriented Lisp (chapter 25)
    http://www.bookshelf.jp/texi/onlisp/onlisp_26.html#SEC156

Wikipedia: Common Lisp Object System

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Lisp_Object_System