subprocess.Popen not replacing current process?
ldo at geek-central.gen.new_zealand
Fri Nov 5 02:54:55 CET 2010
<7c5be6d7-5782-44ad-aae7-7f7bbc798d43 at n32g2000prc.googlegroups.com>, goodman
> Though I'm still a little confused how, if subprocess.Popen is using
> os.execvp, it still maintains control of things like interrupts.
The implied point, being that we are spawning subprocesses, is that there is
a fork call before the exec.
> Anyway, my problem is solved. Thanks!
Glad to hear it.
More information about the Python-list