"Strong typing vs. strong testing"

Lie Ryan lie.1296 at gmail.com
Sun Oct 10 11:44:47 CEST 2010

On 10/02/10 20:04, Nick Keighley wrote:
>>> > > In a statically typed language, the of-the-wrong-type is something which
>>> > > can, by definition, be caught at compile time.
>> >
>> > Any time something is true "by definition" that is an indication that
>> > it's not a particularly useful fact.
> I'm not sure I agree. On occaision knowing something is true-by-
> definition is very useful!

Something that is true by definition is just as useful as saying: "my
program is correct, by definition, because my requirement is what my
code is doing". It's a circular argument, your program requirement, for
which the program is supposed to be tested against, is the code itself;
so whatever undesirable behavior the program might have is parts of the
requirement, so the program is, by definition, bug free and it's user
expectation that's wrong.

More information about the Python-list mailing list