pylint -- should I just ignore it sometimes?
usenet-nospam at seebs.net
Thu Oct 21 20:15:54 CEST 2010
On 2010-10-21, Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel at sequans.com> wrote:
> It can be short if descriptive:
> for o, c in cars:
> for owner, car in cars: # by just using meaningful names you give the
> info to the reader that you expect cars to be a list of tuple (owner, car)
> phone(car) # see how it is easier to spot bug
In this case, yes.
The one that brought this up, though, was "except FooError, e:", and in
that case, there is no need for any further description; the description
is provided by the "except", and "e" is a perfectly reasonable, idiomatic,
pronoun for the caught exception.
Copyright 2010, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / usenet-nospam at seebs.net
http://www.seebs.net/log/ <-- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology) <-- get educated!
I am not speaking for my employer, although they do rent some of my opinions.
More information about the Python-list