Python 2.7 or 3.1

[bradenf at hotmail.com]

I agree +1
Sent wirelessly from my BlackBerry.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo at geek-central.gen.new_zealand>
Sender: python-list-bounces+bradenf=hotmail.com at python.org
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:30:38 
To: <python-list at python.org>
Subject: Re: Python 2.7 or 3.1

In message <mailman.393.1288390263.2218.python-list at python.org>, Christian 
Heimes wrote:

> Am 29.10.2010 23:16, schrieb Lawrence D'Oliveiro:
>
>> In message <mailman.289.1288150693.2218.python-list at python.org>, Jorge
>> Biquez wrote:
>> 
>>> I was wondering if you can comment more about what alternatives to
>>> use instead to MySql. My web solutions do not need "all the power" of
>>> a true database,
>> 
>> Is more than one process likely to access the data at the same time? If
>> so, use MySQL.
> 
> You have to store and acces a LOT of data? Hadoop may the solution.

I don’t think the OP is quite at the level where they need to think in terms 
of something as heavy-hitting as that.

I suggested MySQL because that’s the usual thing people start with for a 
multiuser situation, unless/until they decide they need something more.
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list