Python 2.7 or 3.1

Lawrence D'Oliveiro ldo at geek-central.gen.new_zealand
Sun Oct 31 02:30:38 CEST 2010

In message <mailman.393.1288390263.2218.python-list at>, Christian 
Heimes wrote:

> Am 29.10.2010 23:16, schrieb Lawrence D'Oliveiro:
>> In message <mailman.289.1288150693.2218.python-list at>, Jorge
>> Biquez wrote:
>>> I was wondering if you can comment more about what alternatives to
>>> use instead to MySql. My web solutions do not need "all the power" of
>>> a true database,
>> Is more than one process likely to access the data at the same time? If
>> so, use MySQL.
> You have to store and acces a LOT of data? Hadoop may the solution.

I don’t think the OP is quite at the level where they need to think in terms 
of something as heavy-hitting as that.

I suggested MySQL because that’s the usual thing people start with for a 
multiuser situation, unless/until they decide they need something more.

More information about the Python-list mailing list