ldo at geek-central.gen.new_zealand
Thu Sep 9 02:41:20 CEST 2010
In message <7xeid9gtuq.fsf at ruckus.brouhaha.com>, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo at geek-central.gen.new_zealand> writes:
>> That reinforces my point, about how easy it was to check the correctness
>> of the code. In this case one simple fix, like this ...
>> would render the code watertight. See how easy it is?
> Well, no, it's irrelevant how easy it is to fix the issue after it's
> pointed out.
In that case, I can similarly discount your attempts to fix up issues with
garbage collectors after they’re pointed out, can I not?
> Part of the problem is C itself.
And yet, what are these complicated garbage collectors, that you intend
relying on to work correctly with all their layers of tricks upon tricks,
written in? C.
More information about the Python-list