Too much code - slicing
steve at REMOVE-THIS-cybersource.com.au
Sun Sep 19 05:20:38 CEST 2010
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 19:09:33 -0700, Carl Banks wrote:
> Apart from occasions like this and throwaway one-liners I use regular
> if-then statements. If Python had added the C-like a ? b : c, then I'd
> use it a lot more, since that version is not inherently unbalanced.
Putting aside the over-use of punctuation, The C syntax feels unbalanced
to me. You have:
condition IF true-clause ELSE false-clause
so both clauses follow the test, that is, they're on the same side: ?--
This looks unbalanced to me. And it reads like something Yoda would say,
or Forth code.
But the Python syntax looks balanced to me:
true-clause IF condition ELSE false-clause
which is not only plain English, but perfectly balanced, with a clause on
either side of the test: -?-
Python's ternary-if puts the emphasis on the true-clause, while C's
ternary-if puts the emphasis on the test. I'm not convinced that this is
necessarily a better choice than Python's. It's a *valid* choice, but
better? I don't think so, but I accept that at least partially boils down
to subjective factors.
More information about the Python-list