[OT] Speed-reading [was Re: Too much code - slicing]
usenet-nospam at seebs.net
Mon Sep 20 08:51:52 CEST 2010
On 2010-09-20, Steven D'Aprano <steve at REMOVE-THIS-cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> I don't know about how other people speed-read, but I can assure you that
> when my wife speed-reads, she's not just scanning a few words and
> interpolating between them. She can give you a detailed summary of what
> *actually* happened, not just a good guess. Including pointing out any
> spelling or grammatical errors and clumsy writing. *Especially* the
> spelling errors, they have about the same effect on her reading speed as
> a tree trunk lying across a Formula 1 race track.
Yeah. I think it's because the entire trick is to have a nice smooth
pipeline, and the error-checking mechanism has to be pretty alert for that
to work -- you have to know if something went wrong. And a spelling error
in the text is initially indistinguishable from a reading error in the
Copyright 2010, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / usenet-nospam at seebs.net
http://www.seebs.net/log/ <-- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology) <-- get educated!
I am not speaking for my employer, although they do rent some of my opinions.
More information about the Python-list