[OT] Free software versus software idea patents

Ian Kelly ian.g.kelly at gmail.com
Mon Apr 11 13:26:51 EDT 2011

On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 6:04 PM, harrismh777 <harrismh777 at charter.net> wrote:
> The deal with motive number (2) is that there are fewer and fewer teams who
> are concerned with interoperability. For instance (my team), we moved our
> stuff to gnulinux based systems and dumped Microsoft completely... we have
> no need for them at all (they're dead). The Linux Foundation president made
> a splash the other day by saying that bashing Microsoft was like kicking a
> puppy (the server cloud war is over, and Microsoft lost... big). The desktop
> is all that is left... and that is dying... rapidly. Their lockin is well
> entrenched (like Borg implants ) but the number of mom & pops ( like my
> entire extended family, for instance) who are moving to Ubuntu (themselves)
> is astounding! It will not be long and Microsoft will die... and none too
> soon.

So what is that number?  Anecdotes are unreliable; I would like to see
the actual data.  The only non-techie I personally know who uses Linux
is my wife, and she only uses it because it's what's installed at
home.  My brother-in-law was a Linux fan at one time but has

>    IE is dead. It is flat dead... almost nobody is using it... not even
> die-hard Windows gaming fanboys... we're on our way to freedom.

I'm sorry, but that is patently false.  Just look at the actual data:


Depending on the source, IE's market share is anywhere from 39% to
56%, and all of those sources list it higher than Firefox or any other
single browser.  To say "IE is dead" is either prevarication or
unsubstantiated wishful thinking.


More information about the Python-list mailing list