Feature suggestion -- return if true

James Mills prologic at shortcircuit.net.au
Mon Apr 11 22:44:39 EDT 2011

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Grant Edwards <invalid at invalid.invalid> wrote:
> You stated that
>  return? <expr>
> was equivalent to
>  return <expr> or None

This is _not_ what I said.

Quoting from my earlier post:

>    return? expr

This syntax does not fit well within python ideology.

> be expanded to
>    _temp = expr
>    if _temp: return _temp

This could be simplified to just:

return expr or None

Please read carefully before putting words in my mouth.

I stated very clear y that return? expr didn't seem fitting
in the python ideology as syntax for this behavior.


-- James Mills
-- "Problems are solved by method"

More information about the Python-list mailing list