dan.kluev at gmail.com
Sun Apr 24 23:47:43 CEST 2011
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Ken Seehart <ken at seehart.com> wrote:
> Good point, Benjamin. I didn't think of testing on Jython before
> answering. For practical purposes it's a really good idea to test obscure
> features against all potential target platforms.
> In this case, I would argue that Benjamin's test demonstrates a bug in
It doesn't. __defaults__ was added in 3.x (and it is documented).
Prior to that, in 2.x, there was func_defaults.
Jython is not in 3.x yet, so you should not expect 3.x features there.
As for func_defaults, its there and supported as documented:
Jython 2.5.1+ (Release_2_5_1:exported, Mar 21 2010, 01:00:17)
[Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (Sun Microsystems Inc.)] on java1.6.0_22
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> def test(a=123):
... return a
>>> test.func_defaults = (456,)
With best regards,
More information about the Python-list