Comparing VCS tools (was ""Development tools and practices for Pythonistas")
rustompmody at gmail.com
Wed Apr 27 04:50:23 CEST 2011
On Apr 27, 6:44 am, Tim Chase <python.l... at tim.thechases.com> wrote:
> On 04/26/2011 01:42 PM, Algis Kabaila wrote:
> > Thomas, have you tried bzr (Bazaar) and if so do you consider hg
> > (Mercurial) better?
> > And why is it better? (bzr is widely used in ubuntu, which is
> > my favourite distro at present).
> Each of the main 3 (bzr, hg, git) have advantages and
> disadvantages. As Ben (and others?) mentions, it's best to learn
> one of these instead of starting with something like Subversion
> or worse (CVS or worse, *shudder* MS Visual SourceSafe)
<pros and cons of bzr, git, mercurial snipped>
The distributed revision control page on wikipedia (bottom)
in addition to these, mentions fossil -- something I had not heard of
Its claims seem to match the OPs lightweight requirements more closely
than any other:
(from above link)
Fossil is cross-platform; its source code compiles on Linux, Mac OS X
and Microsoft Windows. It is not only capable of distributed version
control like Git and Mercurial but also supports distributed bug
tracking, a distributed wiki and a distributed blog mechanism all in a
single integrated package. With its built-in and easy-to-use web
interface, Fossil simplifies project tracking and promotes situational
awareness. A user may simply type "fossil ui" from within any check-
out and Fossil automatically opens the user's web browser in a page
that gives detailed history and status information on that project.
Well so much for the claims :-)
What's the facts? Anyone with any experiences on this?
More information about the Python-list