Feature suggestion -- return if true

[James Mills]

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Grant Edwards <invalid at invalid.invalid> wrote:
> You stated that
>
>  return? <expr>
>
> was equivalent to
>
>  return <expr> or None

This is _not_ what I said.

Quoting from my earlier post:

"""
>    return? expr

This syntax does not fit well within python ideology.

> be expanded to
>
>    _temp = expr
>    if _temp: return _temp

This could be simplified to just:

return expr or None
"""

Please read carefully before putting words in my mouth.

I stated very clear y that return? expr didn't seem fitting
in the python ideology as syntax for this behavior.

cheers
James

-- 
-- James Mills
--
-- "Problems are solved by method"