Hardlink sub-directories and files
t at jollybox.de
Wed Aug 3 23:54:03 CEST 2011
On 03/08/11 23:25, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Thomas Jollans <t at jollybox.de
> <mailto:t at jollybox.de>> wrote:
> > Interesting. Of course, it's probably readily available to you. What
> > *ix are you seeing that doesn't include cpio by default?
> Arch Linux - the base install is quite minimal. I just discovered that I
> have a program called bsdcpio which is used by mkinitcpio (and possibly
> other system scripts); no need for the GNU cpio. Curious.
> I guess that makes some sense. If you want to really strip down an
> install, removing cpio is a good candidate since it duplicates what's in
> tar, and tar is more popular - especially for interactive use.
>> Which implementations of cp don't implement -R and -l?
>> Probably most of them, except GNU and newer BSD.
> Okay. While GNU libc manuals usually document how portable functions are
> in detail, that's not true for the GNU coreutils manuals.
> I don't think cpio is in GNU coreutils. Also, I think GNU cpio is a
> reimplementation, not the original.
Indeed. But cp is in the coreutils, and that was what we were talking about.
As for GNU cpio, that's simply what /usr/bin/cpio, if present, is
expected to be on a GNU/Linux system.
> cpio's been around since PWB/Unix, which sits between 6th Edition Unix
> and 7th Edition. It should be in just about everything, unless a
> vendor/distributor got pretty zealous about cutting duplicate utilities.
More information about the Python-list