allow line break at operators
usenet-nospam at seebs.net
Fri Aug 12 17:06:38 EDT 2011
On 2011-08-12, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Seebs <usenet-nospam at seebs.net> wrote:
>> I've seen people in C do stuff like:
>> ? ? ? ?for (i = 0; i < N; ++i);
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?a[i] = 0;
>> This is clearly a case where indentation matches intent, but doesn't match
>> functionality, because C allows indentation to not-match functionality; this
>> is the famous problem Python is solving.
> There's several solutions to this. One is linting utilities that
> detect unexpectedly-indented code, which is the concept that Python
> took to the logical extent of syntactic errors. Another is (again
> linting) to disallow a direct trailing semicolon; if you want an empty
> body, you put whitespace before the semicolon.
> But that wasn't your point, I realise :)
I think it sort of is. My current preference would be that C-like languages
would simply absolutely eliminate optional-braces. Then the whole category
of errors would partially-go-away. You could still have code which didn't
do what you meant, but it would be reliably easy to see what it did, and
so on. But it's interesting to note that there are many ways to address
Most of the C I've done has been in circumstances where misindented code
was in fact a thing that would fail reviews.
Copyright 2011, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / usenet-nospam at seebs.net
http://www.seebs.net/log/ <-- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology) <-- get educated!
I am not speaking for my employer, although they do rent some of my opinions.
More information about the Python-list