Docstrings and class Attributes
John Pinner
funthyme at gmail.com
Wed Aug 10 12:06:02 EDT 2011
On Aug 9, 1:36 am, Ben Finney <ben+pyt... at benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> Ethan Furman <et... at stoneleaf.us> writes:
> > So if property docstrings are so hard to get to, what's the point in
> > having them?
>
> Why would you expect there be a special point to them?
>
> Men, like all primates of any sex, have nipples.
>
> Properties, like any function in Python, have docstrings.
So are you saying that men's nipples are pointless?
You could be correct, except in cold weather maybe.
John
--
>
> They're an accident of the history that led to their implementation, and
> of the pre-existing parts that they're built from. There doesn't need to
> be a point to them (though they might be useful for reasons incidental
> for the reasons they exist).
>
> --
> \ “I filled my humidifier with wax. Now my room is all shiny.” |
> `\ —Steven Wright |
> _o__) |
> Ben Finney
More information about the Python-list
mailing list