Verbose and flexible args and kwargs syntax

[Nick Dokos]

Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula at ling.helsinki.fi> wrote:

> Terry Reedy writes:
> > On 12/12/2011 5:59 AM, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
> > 
> > > Past experience in mathematics newsgroups tells me
> > > that some mathematicians do not accept the existence of any remainder
> > > operator at all.
> > 
> > Even though they carry hour/minute/second remindering devices on their
> > bodies and put year/month/day remaindering devices on their wall?
> > 'Twould be strange indeed!
> 
> They recognize modular arithmetic but for some reason insist that
> there is no such _binary operation_. But as I said, I don't understand
> their concern. (Except the related concern about some programming
> languages, not Python, where the remainder does not behave well with
> respect to division.)

They are probably arguing that it's uniquely defined only on ZxN and
that there are different conventions to extend it to ZxZ (the programming
languages problem that you allude to above - although I don't know what you
mean by "does not behave well wrt division"). See

	 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remainder

If you choose one convention and stick to it, it becomes a well-defined
binary operation. C99 goes one way, python goes a different way (and
mathematics textbooks generally go a third way) and they are all happy,
as long as they don't try to talk to each other (e.g., porting C99
programs to python unthinkingly leads to trouble - duh). It was
implementation dependent in old C (whatever the hardware would give
you), which predictably - with 20-20 hindsight - turned out to be a Very
Bad Idea.

Nick

PS  Z = integers, N = non-negative integers