re.sub(): replace longest match instead of leftmost match?
Duncan Booth
duncan.booth at invalid.invalid
Mon Dec 19 10:46:12 EST 2011
MRAB <python at mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:
> On 16/12/2011 21:04, John Gordon wrote:
>> In<mailman.3737.1324054637.27778.python-list at python.org> Devin
>> Jeanpierre<jeanpierreda at gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> You could use re.finditer to find the longest match, and then
>>> replace it manually by hand (via string slicing).
>>
>>> (a match is the longest if (m.end() - m.start()) is the largest --
>>> so, max(re.finditer(...), key=3Dlambda m: (m.end() =3D m.start()))
>>
>> I ended up doing something similar:
>>
>> # find the longest match
>> longest_match = ''
>> for word in re.findall('((0000:?)+)', ip6):
>> if len(word[0])> len(longest_match):
>> longest_match = word[0]
>>
>> # if we found a match, replace it with a colon
>> if longest_match:
>> ip6 = re.sub(longest_match, ':', ip6, 1)
>>
> For a simple replace, using re is probably overkill. The .replace
> method is a better solution:
>
> ip6 = longest_match.replace(ip6, ':', 1)
I think you got longest_match/ip6 backwards there.
Anyway, for those who like brevity:
try:
ip6 = ip6.replace(max(re.findall('((?:0000:?)+)', ip6), key=len), ':', 1)
except ValueError: pass
--
Duncan Booth http://kupuguy.blogspot.com
More information about the Python-list
mailing list