Tkinter: The good, the bad, and the ugly!

Albert van der Horst albert at spenarnc.xs4all.nl
Fri Jan 14 17:17:01 EST 2011


In article <fe37271c-793d-4018-ac70-6db528270f3e at f30g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
Adam Skutt  <askutt at gmail.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
>
>Replacing TkInter with some sort of minimized wxwidgets is a dumb idea
>for some very obvious reasons, reasons that are obvious if you simply
>look at a widget gallery and then the applications you run on your own
>computer.  Quite honestly, if you're not capable of that, there's
>little reason to believe you'll ever be able to bring forth a
>coherent, cogent proposal.

I really don't follow that. You need a tremendous set to write gimp.
Obviously you won't write gimp in Python.

Now you want to jot together three cooperating screens to specify
some properties for say bluetooth. The proposed set is ample for
that, no?
Such things make up a substantial part of the applications
as far as numbers is concerned. They are probably written by
people who don't want to dive very deeply into GUI.
(Maybe they are more bluetooth experts than GUI-experts, what
would you say?)

>
>Adam

Groetjes Albert

--
-- 
Albert van der Horst, UTRECHT,THE NETHERLANDS
Economic growth -- being exponential -- ultimately falters.
albert at spe&ar&c.xs4all.nl &=n http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst




More information about the Python-list mailing list